Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6290 13
Original file (NR6290 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUARD PUR CORRECTION Ur NAVAL REGORDS
70t S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480

DIC

Docket No. NR6290-13
12 Dec 13

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

11 December 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board

considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/304
dated 20 September 2013, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error of injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application, and
your request for a personal appearance before the Board have been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEDRF
Executive Director

Enclosure: NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/304 dtd 20 Sep 13

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5648 13

    Original file (NR5648 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/241 dated 12 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0746-13

    Original file (NR0746-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/131 dated 1 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5491 13

    Original file (NR5491 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/259 dated 28 August 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1349-13

    Original file (NR1349-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/111 dated 19 April 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1918-13

    Original file (NR1918-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2013, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/140 dtd 7 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0300-13

    Original file (NR0300-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1750-13

    Original file (NR1750-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on ยข September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2348-13

    Original file (NR2348-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/129 dated 1 May 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02121-08

    Original file (02121-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/304 of 8 Apr 08. The petitioner is requesting retroactive advancement to E6 and E7 and advancement to E8 based on awards not recorded on DD Form 214. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9161 13

    Original file (NR9161 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tn addition, the Board considered che advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/063 dtd 20 Feb 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...